tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218687364005396475.post359125756543835477..comments2023-08-01T01:41:47.151+08:00Comments on 宗教共融: 吃肉還是不吃肉:佛教的反思Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08900780867056282510noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218687364005396475.post-11336608992219725072014-12-31T07:41:51.902+08:002014-12-31T07:41:51.902+08:00這篇文章毫無證據理論價值,不像一個修行人的論點, 純粹是邏輯辯論. 例如: 吃肉不會有業力--你如...這篇文章毫無證據理論價值,不像一個修行人的論點, 純粹是邏輯辯論. 例如: 吃肉不會有業力--你如果不去買肉吃加強屠宰場經濟, 誰會幫你殺生? 文中指出的台灣寺廟現象只能說是個別的, 並不能代表多數, 而且論點不見得正確. 最重要的是,作為一個修行者, 別人怎樣是別人的事情. 自我規範是佛教徒通往涅槃之路的必須能力, 把對台灣寺院不正確的觀點用來合理化自己的問題, 那是爭論的手法, 不是有自省能力的佛教徒應有行為.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6218687364005396475.post-90552955388157639742014-12-31T07:33:24.747+08:002014-12-31T07:33:24.747+08:00This essay has very little ground on its own, for ...This essay has very little ground on its own, for three reasons as followed:<br />1. The listed example can not be generally applicable to most of the Mahayana monasteries in Taiwan. <br />2. There's no Theravada scriptural basis holds opposition to meat eating, but your meat purchsing power fuel the profit of the slaughtering house. And you have a choice to not eat if you are on your own and ample vegetarian food is available. The karma is there.<br />3. The paramount importance of Buddhist practitioner, we discipline our behavior for goodness, rather than seeing into other people fault to justify your decidedly wrong doing. Buddhism is not about play out oneself as a great debator of sheer logic, but how you see yourself and carry yourself toward the path of nibbana.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com